I daresay that even they had rather a lot more going on in the ol' cerebral cortex than the author of the "Laci the Dog" blog. This (nominally) literate pooch seems to find the spewing of anti-liberty vitriol as enjoyable as a normal dog would find munching on a rib-eye.
Today, for example she "wrote" a piece that consisted of copy/pasting--in toto*--an LA Times (anti-gun, of course) op-ed ("Fair Use" apparently being a bit above the comprehension ability of this
Because that's its membership base?At least she doesn't bark the lie that her forcible citizen disarmament advocacy is based on a desire to end violence--violence against gun owners amuses her:
Unless the death is Meleanie Hain, then it's funny as hell.. . . followed by:
Other than a few annoying assholes, what's to stop them. Can I shoot a few who want me to pry their guns from their cold, dead fingers?Oh, please, please, PLEASE target me first, Laci--because I suspect that any planned targets after your first are going to miss the fun.
I think armed civilians make great targets!
Don't feel obligated to follow the links--there's no real need to give her the traffic, and besides, like the vast majority of forcible citizen disarmament advocates, she's too cowardly to allow comments--afraid to be sent yelping with her tail between her legs.
*Amusingly enough, she even copied this part: "Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times"
Some village is missing it's idiot
ReplyDeleteOf course New York, (2nd. largest city at the time of the revolution)
really can't be considered a village.
Sad these people can't hear themselves express their poorly thought out opinions. Emotion is no substitute for logic.
Paul in Texas
Oh, hello there, Bitch.
ReplyDeleteTell me--where did you see me use the word "plagiarism," or any form thereof? Since you brought it up, though, if you want to argue that "Fair Use" laws permit copying a 10 (or so--I didn't take time for an exact count) paragraph article in its entirety, go right ahead--it's no skin of my nose, and I acknowledge that the L.A. Times is unlikely to consider you important enough to sue.
As for the "well armed foe," bring it on, Bitch.
Oh, one more thing--in addition to your possibly unprecedented idiocy (even by beagle standards), you're one ugly bitch, too.
You have a lovely evening now, ya' hear?
Says Laci the (nominally) Literate Bitch:
ReplyDeleteBy the way, fuck of a lot of good Melanie's [sic] gun did her!
Guns in backpacks (or in safes, or unloaded, etc.) tend not to be very useful for defense against immediate threats.
It's a shit weapon for self-defence if it can be used against you.
A "point" that might have had some relevance, if her weapon had been the one used against her--but it WASN'T, Bitch. The weapon used against her belonged to her killer, a parole officer who had full arrest powers, by virtue of state law. Besides, what weapon cannot "be used against you"?
I'm beginning to think I overestimated your intelligence.
"I'm beginning to think I overestimated your intelligence."
ReplyDeleteI know I didn't. Recognized it for what it was first off.
Well, in fairness to me, Third, my overestimation of her intelligence placed her at around the nematode level of intellect. Little did I know that I'd need to revise it down to the level of celery, or so (not clever celery, mind you).
ReplyDeleteZorro--LOVE the profile pic!
ReplyDelete