tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34529754.post8565654461231279024..comments2023-10-16T07:06:52.428-05:00Comments on Armed and Safe: Why this citizen disarmament advocating, tyranny enabling, bed-wetting hysteria is a good thingKurt '45superman' Hofmannhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14091930034162667742noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34529754.post-88377460384222922602009-04-06T03:36:00.000-05:002009-04-06T03:36:00.000-05:00Join the Oath Keepers.http://www.thementalmilitia....Join the Oath Keepers.<BR/>http://www.thementalmilitia.com/forums/index.phpAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34529754.post-32283183491742844592007-10-23T20:49:00.000-05:002007-10-23T20:49:00.000-05:00No, they're listening even if they can't follow th...No, they're listening even if they can't follow the whole thing. At least, they've been listening where I live ever since there was home invasion, rape and arson-murder in Cheshire Connecticut.<BR/><BR/>Well, now that the "collective rights" to non-tangible non-property theory has lost popularity, we're back to: "it means the National Guard". And once that's debunked, it'll mean the militia which purportedly no longer exists, and no longer needs to. I don't think they're going to be able to get enough states to rewrite their constitutions fast enough to dispose of the <A HREF="http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/beararms/statecon.htm" REL="nofollow">rest of the evidence</A> before people notice.<BR/><BR/><I>"...every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state..."<BR/><BR/>"The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the State shall not be impaired..."<BR/><BR/>"The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall be called in question..."<BR/><BR/>"Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state."<BR/><BR/>"A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and State, and for hunting and recreational use."<BR/><BR/>"The people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves and the State."<BR/><BR/>"The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security..."<BR/><BR/>"Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state."<BR/><BR/>"That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property...shall not be questioned..."<BR/></I><BR/><BR/><BR/>There are more, and they cover a span of time from when the Bill of Rights was penned up until Hawaii joined the Union. (Hawii: <I>A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."</I>)<BR/><BR/>That the right to keep and bear arms also meant personal defense is an incontrovertible <I>fact</I>, and a contemporary legal idea in this country. I don't expect every single person to get this -- some states' legislatures used contradictory language in their right to keep and bear amendments -- but it remains that there is an overwhelming body of evidence that what we say it means <I>is what it means.</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34529754.post-86646628794823715752007-10-18T07:35:00.000-05:002007-10-18T07:35:00.000-05:00I'd write, but every time I send something to that...I'd write, but every time I send something to that litterbox liner of a local paper it goes unprinted.<BR/><BR/>We'll never make the mainstream listen, we have to rely on one on one . You can't fight the herd mentality, the hoplophobes feed off each others ignorance and hatred and all thinking is disabled.<BR/><BR/>-HHAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com