Yesterday, I discussed the growing effort for a renewed ban of so-called "assault weapons." Such bans invariably incorporate a limit on the magazine capacity--the now expired federal ban stipulated ten rounds as the acceptable limit. The supposed rationale is that without "high capacity" (translation: normal capacity) magazines, a deranged killer will not be able to inflict as much carnage as he would if he had to reload more often. [More]Today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner column is up, taking a look at magazine capacity limit laws. Please give it a look, and spread the word.
By the way, I don't know what happened yesterday, but St. Louis GRE had a very big day--I wish I knew whom to thank for that. Since I don't, I'll just assume it's my loyal readers (both of you must have been extremely busy)--thanks, guys!
- National Gun Rights Examiner: 'Assault weapons' ban jewel in Obama crown
Los Angeles Gun Rights Examiner: Take me shooting, Part II: Personal Dignity in self-rule. - Cleveland Gun Rights Examiner: Overreacting to gun deaths
- Charlotte Gun Rights Examiner: 'Gun Trafficking' bill for NC? Part 3: Traced guns are not 'crime guns'
No comments:
Post a Comment