Pages

Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Carrying a defensive firearm should not require surrendering one's privacy

In response, I would first point out that lack of a carry permit can hardly be thought of as compelling evidence that the person in question is not carrying a firearm. Secondly, what I think "seems like a legitimate question to ask," is "What if you're an abuser, and you want to know if the person whom you are abusing is carrying a concealed weapon?"

In conclusion, while protection of the privacy of carry permit holders is a welcome development, I cannot help but think about how this entire debate could have been avoided, by simply not requiring a permit in the first place for exercise of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms. [More]
That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Digg me?



No comments:

Post a Comment