As I pointed out yesterday, Helmke's mention of "stockpiling private arsenals" prompted me to wonder if the Brady Campaign is now advocating limits on the total number of firearms and/or the amount of ammunition a citizen may own. That, in turn, reminded me that such limits would not be a new objective for the Brady Campaign.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner column. Hope you like it, and tell a friend.
Enter S. 1878 (from the 103rd Congressional session), the "Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994," sometimes referred to colloquially as the "Brady Act II." [More]
Posted with thanks to Bob S., for asking the question that inspired this article, and to Thirdpower, for reminding me of one of the provisions of Brady II.
Digg me?
Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:
- Atlanta: Restaurant with anti-gun policy saved by a gun
- Austin: Does Violence Policy Center Represent the People? (Part 1)
- Boston: Accidental firearm discharge still brings maximum sentence, Supreme Court says
- Charlotte: Are sheriffs using taxpayer money to trample taxpayer gun rights?
- Cleveland: Ohio Sheriff wants help stopping gas station robber
- DC: More guns, less pirates
- Denver: How do you stop the first time?
- Los Angeles: Meeting the Hate, Part III: breaking the cycle.
- Milwaukee: Milwaukee Police Chief Flynn bullies gun owners
- Minneapolis: Are gun owners facing a ‘perfect storm’?
- National: New York 'gun day' showcases false crime-fighting promises
- Seattle: Montana lawmakers have it right with new statute on self-defense
- Wisconsin: The time for civil obediance is now
No comments:
Post a Comment