See? Those "heavy weapons" are "not the issue." Um--why not? Don't they provide a lot more killing capability than firearms more typically available to civilians? Isn't their enhanced killing capability much of the reason for their issuance to military forces? Why, then, would they be less "the issue" than semi-automatic, civilian firearms? [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
No comments:
Post a Comment