Additionally, even apart from any discussion of the appropriateness of the use of Holocaust imagery in this debate, Sen. Schoenberg owes his constituency an explanation as to why his personal affront should be more important than good public policy. If he "understand[s] the need to balance an individual's privacy with the public's right to know," but votes against the bill simply because he is "outraged" at the tactics of some of the bill's supporters, is he not putting his personal feelings ahead of the needs of the people he ostensibly represents? [More]
That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
No comments:
Post a Comment