
That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.The problem--the contemptible, lower-than-snake-excrement shamelessness that this column hopes to illustrate--is the fact that these officials are openly, publicly admitting that in the interests of political self-preservation, they are willing to take action that they evidently believe violates their oath to uphold the Constitution--the most solemn, sacred obligation of any public servant.
Does the fact that they're utterly wrong about the supposed unconstitutionality of HB 436 mitigate their crime? That depends on one's point of view. Is "attempted oath-breaking" less heinous than success at that crime? [More]
No comments:
Post a Comment