Just a short post today--Independence Day isn't for blogging.
Well, apparently the BATFE's outrageous abuses at a Richmond, VA gun show in August, 2005 were perfectly fine after all--at least according to the "Justice" Department (Orwell would be proud of that organizational title). Keep in mind that even the BATFE stormtroopers eventually admitted that this kind of operation was a bit over the top, but now the Justice Department has absolved them.
Wait a second, though--isn't the BATFE part of the Justice Department? Are we to consider a vast (and vastly powerful) government agency investigating one of its own subsidiaries to be independent oversight? Are we truly that gullible?
Happy Independence Day.
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Isn't that like putting a fox in charge of henhouse security?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
BATF is part of the treasury dept
BATF is part of the treasury dept
Not anymore--they moved to the Department of "Justice" as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002.
the "just us" department..."only ones" mentality to be sure.
Just Us Department--I'm going to have to start using that.
We haven't had a justice department for years now. We have a legal department, with no justice.
The Gun Guys are trumpeting this report, because, you know, if they made a lot of arrests, then whatever they did must be justified, right?
This is the same logic used by a committee of the Illinois legislature that once considered the question of whether Illinois weapon laws infringed on a right of self-defense. They concluded (in writing!) that although Illinois laws as written prevented a lot of self defense, they could not be changed, because if they were, fewer people would be arrested on weapons charges.
No kidding. I need to try to find the binder with that in it.
This is the same logic used by a committee of the Illinois legislature that once considered the question of whether Illinois weapon laws infringed on a right of self-defense. They concluded (in writing!) that although Illinois laws as written prevented a lot of self defense, they could not be changed, because if they were, fewer people would be arrested on weapons charges.
No kidding. I need to try to find the binder with that in it.
If not for my (tragic) familiarity with this state, I might have trouble believing you, Don--as it is, though, that sounds just about par for course.
A bullet wound cannot be absolved by an administrative action. I predict that if the sonsabitches don't dial it back, they will be finding the hard truth of it.
Post a Comment