Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National
Dave Workman/Seattle:
Also check out these other Liberty-oriented Examiners:
Happy New Year, everyone.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National
Still, these difficulties do not have to mean that the only option is to throw up one's hands and abdicate responsibility for one's own and one's family's security and liberty, counting on the government's protection. An aspiring "Militia of One" who wishes to "well-regulate" himself can, in numerous ways, improve his ability survive a crisis. Just a few ideas . . . [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National
Or perhaps it's not so remarkable. After all, when the Bill of Rights states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, those who want to do the infringing have little choice but to ignore or disparage the Constitution (or just edit it to one's advantage). [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Richard Nascak/Ft. Myers:
Now one would think that if microstamping were as effective a crime fighting tool as some would lead us to believe, proponents would be thrilled to have their assertions borne out by the National Academy of Sciences. As it turns out, though, the bill was introduced by Congressman Dan Boren (NRA Board of Directors member), and all eight of the co-sponsors are at worst neutral on gun rights, with most being supportive, and some quite highly regarded by the not easily impressed Gun Owners of America. Why aren't Brady Campaign endorsees in droves supporting it? [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
I won't begrudge the mayors their protective details, or even the public being billed for that security. What is intolerable and unconscionable is that the mayors work to deny their benefactors the right to the means to provide their own security. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
Then again, the Holder Justice Department claims the authority to kill American citizens, preemptively, without a trial, so I suppose it makes a certain kind of sense that Holder would want the power to disarm them first. Stirring fears of "homegrown terrorists" helps to lay the groundwork for Americans' acquiescence to these usurpations, so Holder's public alarmism makes a certain (twisted) kind of sense, as well. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Mike Stollenwerk/DC:
Congressman Rehberg's press release does not indicate who the 33 co-signers are, so the only safe assumption each of us can make is that our congressman did not sign it, and it's up to us to urge them to send another letter, along the lines of, "What they said--us too!" [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
They already "expect" to go through with this--in two or three weeks time--regardless, apparently, of what the public says. Not "propose" to dramatically expand the already unconstitutional regulation of firearms commerce; not "hope" to do so; and certainly not "humbly request the public's permission" for this new regulatory power--they "expect" it. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Ed Stone/Atlanta:
Presumably, she has some awareness of the fact that it's difficult to teach kids about "the difference between toy guns and real firearms," without ever exposing them to real firearms. After all, even the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has trouble figuring out the difference between real guns and toys. It's also interesting that the "four gun safety teaching points" promoted by the California Bureau of Firearms ("Stop! Don't Touch. Leave the area. Tell an adult.") are exactly the four taught in the NRA's "Eddie Eagle" program. Who'd have guessed that Brady Campaign highest-scoring California would use the same child gun safety education that has some anti-gun groups in such high dudgeon? [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Mike Stollenwerk/DC:
Kaplan, in fact, claims that winning the Supreme Court's acknowledgment, in Heller, that the Second Amendment disallows handgun bans, was not "complex." That kinda sounds as if he's saying that it's a simple matter to understand that the Second Amendment guarantees individual citizens' right to keep and bear arms. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Friday was the day that the BATFE finally went public with the proposal (pdf file), starting the 60-day comment period (for a proposal they hope to implement in 19 days). Some gun rights advocates in St. Louis and elsewhere may wish to comment, but are perhaps at a loss for words. The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) makes some good suggestions about points to make, but I personally decided to focus on the BATFE's authority (or, more accurately, their lack of it). This is what I sent to BarbaraTerrell@atf.gov . . . [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Rob Reed/Detroit:
According to the Washington Post, the idea is to take a smaller (and therefore apparently considered more politically viable) bite of the apple, by somewhat limiting the scope of the new regulations. Thus, the multiple long gun sales requirement would only apply to certain rifles (detachable magazine-fed, semiautomatic rifles above .22 caliber--so called "assault weapons," very broadly defined, in other words), and only gun dealers near the Mexican border would be affected. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Rob Reed/Detroit:
This is where Cook County brazenly distorts quotes from the McDonald decision, in order to try to bolster their case. The details of how, exactly, Cook County tried to pull (the brief can be seen here--pdf file) a fast one are a bit long to post here, but are summed up very well in this post at Illinois Carry. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Liston Matthews/Knoxville:
If the Obama administration fears the public's reaction to oppressive new firearms regulation (imposed by administrative fiat, to boot), to the extent that it is trying to implement the new regulations in secret, perhaps it ought to give up, in deference to the will of the people. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
What gun owners can do right now is to click here and submit penetrating questions (not "How many guns do you own?") about the candidates' positions on the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Richard Nascak/Ft. Myers:
Click here for The Watchmen Radio Network.
Click here to listen live, starting at 9:00 pm EST/6:00 pm PST and all points in between and around.
Obviously, though, "vulnerable and outgunned" is exactly what compliance with Mexican gun laws would leave them, and the BATFE is steadily ramping up its efforts to assist in the enforcement of those laws.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
At the same time, Americans are being told that we must have similar laws here in the U.S. [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Steve D. Jones/Fort Smith:
And lest any readers believe this was just fear mongering and/or "NRA bashing" on the part of Mr. Valone and Gun Owners of America, such horror stories have come to pass. Fort Smith Gun Rights Examiner Steve D. Jones informed us back in September of the disarmament of Wayne Irelan, who became a "prohibited person" by virtue of the fact that he needed help keeping track of his finances--sounds like a ticking time bomb, doesn't he?" National Gun Rights Examiner David Codrea pointed out that Mr. Irelan's wife became a de facto "prohibited person," too, by virtue of living with Mr. Irelan . . . [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
The most fundamentally offensive aspect of Daley's demand for a gun registry, accessible by officers' in-car computers, is that it treats gun ownership itself as a suspect activity, indicative of a tendency toward criminal violence. That, of course, is exactly how Daley views private gun ownership, and why he finds the lack of the computerized registry "annoying." [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Steve D. Jones/Fort Smith:
Josh Horwitz, of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, would have to be considered the "winner" of the race to the ethical bottom, though, in comparing Mr. D'Cruz to the Columbine killers.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
[ . . . ]
I suppose, though, that next to lobbying for the continued mandate of Mr. D'Cruz's defenselessness, vilely libeling him is a small matter. [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Steve D. Jones/Fort Smith:
Of course, that "spilled" violence poses a threat not only to rangers, but to park visitors, as well. The good news is that, since February of this year, national parks no longer ban effective self-defense. This change was not met with universal approval, of course. As we've discussed before, the very need for the ability to defend oneself was scorned by some, including a National Park Sevice retiree quoted by the Violence Policy Center's Josh Sugarmann, in the Huffington Post . . . [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Steve D. Jones/Fort Smith:
That statement probably sounds a bit odd, coming as it does in a column that tends to focus on Obama's hostility to private gun ownership. And no--I have no knowledge of President Obama specifically mentioning the BATFE as an agency that must be held to account, but let's look at one of the Obama-Biden administration's promises, listed at "Change.gov" . . . [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Given her longstanding hostility to private firearm ownership, I imagine Josh Horwitz is going to be willing to give her a pass about her "insurrectionist rhetoric," as I expect the Brady Campaign will do, as well. And that strikes me as a bit odd, given the furor raised by those organizations, over Sharron Angle's reference to "Second Amendment remedies," during her attempt this year to take Harry Reid's U.S. Senate seat away from him in Nevada. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Steve D. Jones/Fort Smith:
Apparently, though, the concern now is that passengers with evil intent will sneak into the baggage car, find their stowed weapons and ammo, and then run amok. Sounds as if some folks have imaginations worthy of "Snakes on a Plane," doesn't it? [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
John Longenecker/Los Angeles:
And with health care reform moving in the direction of putting the federal government in charge of the purse strings involved in paying for medical care, what's to stop an anti-gun administration (the kind of administration, for example, that would pick Eric Holder for Attorney General, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, and Andrew Traver as head of the BATFE) from putting some rather effective back-channel pressure on the mental health care folks, to come up with a diagnosis that calls for a prescription for disarmament? [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
Note also that the sucide rate among concealed carry licensees is lower (by a fair margin) than that among law enforcement officers, and yet law enforcement officers are the "Only Ones" the VPC would have us trust with guns (to the extent that Sugarmann advocates an outright national ban on handguns for non-"Only Ones"). [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner (better late than never--internet trouble). Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition.Rudyard Kipling
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.Claire Wolfe
When I die, it won't be for lack of firepower.45superman