With governments historically being by far the most prolific mass-murderers in the world, (and with the victims often chosen along ethnic lines), how can protection of the legitimacy of the process by which the government is chosen be considered "racist," while far more onerous requirements for possessing the tools to resist such murderous tyranny is not? [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Oh, and if you could spare a digg?
Stumble it!
0 comments:
Post a Comment