Mission statement:

Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.

I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

California legislator wants to ban popular firearm accessory, and discussion


The chilling part, though, is the next sentence. Yee would apparently allow "no debate, no discussion" about effective militia capable arms for Californians. If he feels so free to trample the first two amendments of the Bill of Rights, can his attacks on the other eight be far behind? [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Oh, and if you could spare a digg?

2 comments:

MamaLiberty said...

None of the guns in question are in any way, shape or form "assault" weapons. It would seem important to keep this distinction when talking or writing about the guns being regulated or "banned." We, at least, should use the proper terms.

Kurt "45superman" Hofmann said...

I definitely agree, which is why I make a point of always putting "assault weapons" within quotes, and often preceding the term with "so-called."