That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.The chilling part, though, is the next sentence. Yee would apparently allow "no debate, no discussion" about effective militia capable arms for Californians. If he feels so free to trample the first two amendments of the Bill of Rights, can his attacks on the other eight be far behind? [More]
Oh, and if you could spare a digg?
Stumble it!
2 comments:
None of the guns in question are in any way, shape or form "assault" weapons. It would seem important to keep this distinction when talking or writing about the guns being regulated or "banned." We, at least, should use the proper terms.
I definitely agree, which is why I make a point of always putting "assault weapons" within quotes, and often preceding the term with "so-called."
Post a Comment