It occurs to me that if a man were to kill seven people and wound ten more with a gun, the advocates of forcible citizen disarmament would hail the atrocity as a reason to support their agenda. When the sick thug instead uses a truck and a knife for his evil, though, we hear nothing.
Are the deaths of innocent people murdered by means other than firearms somehow less appalling, less tragic, than shooting deaths?
I submit that they are not.
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Sunday, June 08, 2008
Mass killing in Japan--but at least no one was shot
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
No, but many believe them to be less dead.
No, but many believe them to be less dead.
That does seem to be their "thinking," SA--and how does one argue with "logic" like that?
Post a Comment