Mission statement:

Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.

I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Not a bright dog, but somewhat amusing

My father being a rabbit hunter, I grew up in a house that always had beagles (or sometimes, beagle/basset mixes). Charming dogs, for the most part, but to call them "not the intellectual powerhouses of the canine universe" would be to do them a very generous kindness. And yet . . .

I daresay that even they had rather a lot more going on in the ol' cerebral cortex than the author of the "Laci the Dog" blog. This (nominally) literate pooch seems to find the spewing of anti-liberty vitriol as enjoyable as a normal dog would find munching on a rib-eye.

Today, for example she "wrote" a piece that consisted of copy/pasting--in toto*--an LA Times (anti-gun, of course) op-ed ("Fair Use" apparently being a bit above the comprehension ability of this bitch . . . er, female dog), with her only addition being her title, "NRA Has Yet to Explain Why It Wants to Help Killers, Criminals, and Lunatics Get Guns," followed by a bit of libel, for good measure:

Because that's its membership base?
At least she doesn't bark the lie that her forcible citizen disarmament advocacy is based on a desire to end violence--violence against gun owners amuses her:
Unless the death is Meleanie Hain, then it's funny as hell.
. . . followed by:
Other than a few annoying assholes, what's to stop them. Can I shoot a few who want me to pry their guns from their cold, dead fingers?

I think armed civilians make great targets!
Oh, please, please, PLEASE target me first, Laci--because I suspect that any planned targets after your first are going to miss the fun.

Don't feel obligated to follow the links--there's no real need to give her the traffic, and besides, like the vast majority of forcible citizen disarmament advocates, she's too cowardly to allow comments--afraid to be sent yelping with her tail between her legs.



*Amusingly enough, she even copied this part: "Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times"

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Some village is missing it's idiot
Of course New York, (2nd. largest city at the time of the revolution)
really can't be considered a village.
Sad these people can't hear themselves express their poorly thought out opinions. Emotion is no substitute for logic.
Paul in Texas

Laci the Chinese Crested said...

It's called attribution, cretin. That takes it from being plagiarism.

But you are too stupid to know that.

If you think that you can fight a well armed foe with a rifle, then you are far more of a moron than I am.

You are a complete asshole.

Unfotunately, people like you are breeding.

Laci the Chinese Crested said...

By the way, fuck of a lot of good Melanie's gun did her!

It's a shit weapon for self-defence if it can be used against you.

45superman said...

Oh, hello there, Bitch.

Tell me--where did you see me use the word "plagiarism," or any form thereof? Since you brought it up, though, if you want to argue that "Fair Use" laws permit copying a 10 (or so--I didn't take time for an exact count) paragraph article in its entirety, go right ahead--it's no skin of my nose, and I acknowledge that the L.A. Times is unlikely to consider you important enough to sue.

As for the "well armed foe," bring it on, Bitch.

Oh, one more thing--in addition to your possibly unprecedented idiocy (even by beagle standards), you're one ugly bitch, too.

You have a lovely evening now, ya' hear?

45superman said...

Says Laci the (nominally) Literate Bitch:

By the way, fuck of a lot of good Melanie's [sic] gun did her!

Guns in backpacks (or in safes, or unloaded, etc.) tend not to be very useful for defense against immediate threats.

It's a shit weapon for self-defence if it can be used against you.

A "point" that might have had some relevance, if her weapon had been the one used against her--but it WASN'T, Bitch. The weapon used against her belonged to her killer, a parole officer who had full arrest powers, by virtue of state law. Besides, what weapon cannot "be used against you"?

I'm beginning to think I overestimated your intelligence.

Thirdpower said...

"I'm beginning to think I overestimated your intelligence."

I know I didn't. Recognized it for what it was first off.

45superman said...

Well, in fairness to me, Third, my overestimation of her intelligence placed her at around the nematode level of intellect. Little did I know that I'd need to revise it down to the level of celery, or so (not clever celery, mind you).

Zorro said...

That's one STUPID dog.

45superman said...

Zorro--LOVE the profile pic!