Judge Urbina ruled that every one of those restrictions was permissible under the Second Amendment. The tragedy here is that a reading of the majority decision in the Heller case, written by Justice Scalia, gives little reason for optimism that the Supreme Court will disagree (if the expected appeal ever gets that far). The further tragedy is that, as I discussed here, even the expected "favorable" ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago would mean that the Supreme Court's tepid endorsement of the right to keep and bear arms, as codified in the Heller decision, would become the only hurdle--nationwide--a prospective gun law would have to clear in order to be "presumptively lawful." [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Give it a look?
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Federal judge edits 'not' out of 'shall not be infringed'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment