Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Mike Stollenwerk/DC:
Dave Workman/Seattle:
- Three Wash. Senators ‘dancing in blood’ to push anti-gun agenda?
- Gun group blasts TX prof who said school shooting is ‘typical 2A exercise’
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Mike Stollenwerk/DC:
Even repeal of the Second Amendment would not solve Prof. Johnson's problem, of course, given that since the Supreme Court's U.S. v. Cruikshank decision in 1876, the right to keep and bear arms is known to predate "the Constitution, and neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence."That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Johnson's even bigger problem is that some of us won't be disarmed no matter what political maneuverings are undertaken for that purpose. How high is he willing to stack the bodies before accepting that the rights of a free people are never "trivial"? [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
Since then, we've seen times when nearly the entire police force of the city called in "sick," because of impending layoffs, and that the city had come close to hiring a convicted felon as police chief.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Given all that, it gets harder and harder to avoid the conclusion that what East St. Louis needs is not oppressive new gun laws inflicted on the rest of the state, but to clean up its own violent, criminal mess. [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Mike Stollenwerk/DC:
It's funny. Groups like CSGV never tire of arguing that (the Suprme Court's Heller ruling to the contrary notwithstanding) that the Second Amendment's guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms applies only to a government-sanctioned militia. Now, though, when there is talk of the formation of new state militias, they scream about the "insurrectionist" threat posed by that. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
It could be worse--Aimpoint apparently does not demand that buyers be "Only Ones," as some makers of tactical equipment, including "assault backpacks," do. Nor is it as offensive as selling one precision rifle for law enforcement/military work, with the rest of us limited to another version, deliberately made less capable (but still costing over $10,000). It's certainly less disgusting than using an FBI political hitman to hawk their wares.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Still, though, promoting the idea that effective fighting arms and equipment belong more naturally to government enforcers than to we who are "necessary to the security of a free state" is offensive, and should not be allowed to go unremarked. [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
That is not how I would write such a law now. I was more inclined to mercy back then than I am now--probably because I had never conceived of the possibility of an administration so far lost to honor and decency, so single-mindedly intent on disarming American citizens, that it would deliberately arm the most brutal killers in North America, leading to the deaths of hundreds of Mexican citizens and two U.S. law enforcement officers, all to make the case for trampling the Second Amendment into the blood-soaked dirt.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
For those officials, there can be no total amnesty--leaving the government is not nearly enough. For them, the best I would offer is to take the death penalty off the table. That's far more than they deserve, but gun rights advocates are, by and large, peaceable folk, willing to put non-violence ahead of the justice of seeing the perpetrators dangling from short ropes. [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
It should be pointed out that Microsoft has already stated that crime statistics--not ethnic makeup--will determine which areas users will be advised to avoid. If people like Juanita Wallace fear that crime statistics disproportionately implicate neighborhoods of certain ethnic compositions, it would seem that she has on some level noticed the "elephant in the room," even if she is not quite ready to come out and acknowledge it:That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.And we also can't forget to look at race--not as a cause of violent crime, but as an indicator of populations most directly affected by and responsive to a continuing history of destructive government policies.[More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
The goal of the course is for the shooter to be consistently able to hit a man sized target at a range of 500 yards.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
A student who can do this can thus be considered to be at the center of a 162-acre "circle of liberty" (that's right, Peter King--our circle is bigger than yours) whenever she has her rifle in hand, because a would-be oppressor exists within that circle only with her permission. That notion will presumably not sit well with the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (CSGV), who would no doubt consider it "insurrectionist." CSGV, in fact, mentions Appleseed (none too approvingly) in their "Insurrectionism Timeline" . . . [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
This, we were told, is necessary because "health care is a right." Well--okay, but those who make that argument seem to define "rights" rather differently than gun rights advocates tend to. To satisfy us that our gun rights are not being violated, all we tend to demand is that the government not actively interfere with them. We certainly don't demand that some entity (taxpayers) buy us guns we cannot afford on our own. Nor do many of us advocate federal prison sentences for those who refuse to exercise that right.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Perhaps that's a mistake on our part. Perhaps we could be seen as more "progressive" if we demand the coercive power of government to provide us with firepower we could not otherwise afford, and to forcibly compel those who do not wish to possess firearms to do so regardless. [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Mike Stollenwerk/DC:
Besides, what if, in the Brady Campaign's words, "California continues to blaze" more "legislative trails in adopting lifesaving gun laws"--perhaps gun laws that create new classes of "prohibited purchasers"--such as "suspected terrorists" (and keep in mind that some would like to classify the entire NRA, or the Tea Party, as "terrorists"), or medical marijuana users? Another possibility is a heretofore legal handgun suddenly becoming illegal, after California "blazes" another "legislative trail." [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
To my absolute absence of surprise, my first attempt to comment on a Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (CSGV) Facebook post was nearly instantly met with "Reasoned Discourse."
The post in question was this one:
"Although bad laws, if they exist, should be repealed as soon as possible, still while they continue in force, for the sake of example, they should be religiously observed ... There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law." - Abraham Lincoln, January 27, 1838Here was my (now censored out of existence) response:
Bad laws "should be religiously observed," eh? Not even pretending to honor the memory of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his civil disobedience, I see:Funny--not long ago, they pretended to express deep (if not particularly musical) admiration for Dr. King Lying hypocrites tend not to take long to out themselves, though.One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.
- Martin Luther King Jr.I submit that an individual who breaks the law that conscience tells him is unjust and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the very highest respect for law.I could add some Thoreau and Gandhi quotes, too, but there's clearly no point--your love of authoritarianism brooks no trifling with quibbling about such inconsequential concerns as "injustice."
- Martin Luther King Jr.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
The president either forgets, or simply does not care, that many Americans would be glad of such protection for their own children. We don't demand the kind of taxpayer funded, elite protection that he and his family enjoy. Non-interference with our own self-defense measures is enough for us. Apparently, even that's too much for Obama to agree to.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
The thing is, we're not asking. [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Sean McClanahan/Des Moines:
Still, seeing that the best the organization can come up with is a $250 per person fundraising event with Chicago Mayor (and would-be statewide handgun registrar) Rahm Emanuel, a little advice does seem warranted. Although if Emanuel reprises his 1992 drama, where he stabbed a steak knife into a table over and over again, while listing the names of political enemies and shouting "Dead! Dead!" that might be worth the price of admission. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Liston Matthews/Knoxville:
So if much of the upper reaches of federal law enforcement knew of the plan, and if the cartel's gun trafficking "big fish" were actually working for the FBI--what does that say about the intent of the operation? Yesterday, the Investor's Business Daily offered a possibility:That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.Coulson paints a picture not of a well-intentioned local program gone rogue, but of a operation widely known throughout the Obama administration, one deliberately intended to promote the need for gun control.[More]
The folks at Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (CSGV) are enthusiastic practitioners of "Reasoned Discourse," whereby comments that don't toe the party line are "disappeared," so as to hide the fact that a sizable plurality (if not majority) of their readership is comprised of not their "gun control" fellow travelers, but gun rights advocates keeping an eye on the forcible citizen disarmament mendacity du jour.
CSGV's Facebook page is a prime example of that--but tonight, they've outdone themselves:
"View all -1 comments." Evidently, they've been so busy removing comments that they deleted one more than had been left.
Kinda impressive, in a pathetic sorta way.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
The intent here is not to argue that Brock has no right to hire armed security, even if his specific fears sound more than a little delusional. The intent instead is to highlight the breathtaking hypocrisy of accepting huge sums of money in payment for advocacy of restrictive gun laws that he himself clearly believes should not apply to him. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Sean McClanahan/Des Moines:
In the end, there is no "internet gun sale loophole." Gun sales arranged online are subject to every state, federal and local law imposed on every other gun sale in the same jurisdiction. The internet's only role is facilitating potential buyers finding potential sellers.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
The goal here, just as with all the rhetoric about the "gun show loophole," is the outright prohibition of the "loophole" of all private sales. And yes--when a gun sale subjects the would-be buyer to a criminal (and increasingly, medical) background check by the FBI, it is not a "private" sale, by any sane use of the word, whether the seller is a federally licensed gun dealer or not.
We're not going to take it. [More]
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
Just across the river, Illinois appears poised to have a busy year for the gun issue, on fronts both legal and legislative. Being the last state to still have in place an absolute blanket ban on all armed self-defense in public, some action in this area is much needed. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
David Codrea/National:
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Sean McClanahan/Des Moines:
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Ed Stone/Atlanta:
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Ed Stone/Atlanta:
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Sean McClanahan/Des Moines:
Here's the latest from my fellow GREs:
Sean McClanahan/Des Moines:
Still, though, having seen a great deal from Congress that deserves contempt (the minority report by Rep. Elijah Cummings, in order to whitewash the scandal, seems a superb example), one could perhaps forgive actions that express that contempt.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
What cannot be forgiven, though, is the deliberate arming of some of the most brutal criminal gangs on the continent (in the western hemisphere, for that matter), who used those weapons in the killing of hundreds (if not thousands) of people. Even less forgivable is when this atrocity is committed for the purpose of justifying more attacks on Americans' Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms. [More]
A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition.Rudyard Kipling
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.Claire Wolfe
When I die, it won't be for lack of firepower.45superman