Mission statement:

Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.

I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

'Patrol rifles' vs. 'assault weapons' revisited: A shot in the back?

It could be worse--Aimpoint apparently does not demand that buyers be "Only Ones," as some makers of tactical equipment, including "assault backpacks," do. Nor is it as offensive as selling one precision rifle for law enforcement/military work, with the rest of us limited to another version, deliberately made less capable (but still costing over $10,000). It's certainly less disgusting than using an FBI political hitman to hawk their wares.

Still, though, promoting the idea that effective fighting arms and equipment belong more naturally to government enforcers than to we who are "necessary to the security of a free state"
is offensive, and should not be allowed to go unremarked. [More]
That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Oh, and if you could spare a digg?