The intent here is not to argue that Brock has no right to hire armed security, even if his specific fears sound more than a little delusional. The intent instead is to highlight the breathtaking hypocrisy of accepting huge sums of money in payment for advocacy of restrictive gun laws that he himself clearly believes should not apply to him. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Oh, and if you could spare a digg?
Stumble it!
0 comments:
Post a Comment