Former Supreme Court Justice cites flawed interpretation of flawed decision

The forcible citizen disarmament lobby's reliance on the (badly, and probably deliberately, misinterpreted) Miller decision is notable for another reason. Has so much weight ever been accorded to any other Supreme Court decision in which there was no oral argument given--nor even a written brief filed--for the defense?

That, one could argue, is just what one might expect from the Second Amendment deniers. Like a government bent on tyranny (or a thug bent on rape, or a lunatic bent on mass murder), they greatly prefer that their objective be undefended, and their agenda unopposed. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.