That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.With the Supreme Court, after all, having ruled that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right of the people, and if the nominal cost of photo ID is an illegal imposition on the right to vote, how can banning "cheap handguns" be anything but an imposition on the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms?
Still, racial issues aside, a president with a well known, long established proclivity for "gun control," who now seems willing to impose such control by making firearms too expensive to own, could be said to have an incentive to govern in such a way as to foster a moribund economy that renders vast numbers of Americans of all races too poor to defend themselves. [More]
Stumble it!
2 comments:
You always forget the part where the Supreme Court said reasonable restrictions are acceptable. In other words you "shall not be infringed" idea is bullshit.
Is that what I "always forget," Bonomo? Wrong. I never forget Scalia's limp surrender to the "progressive," tryanny-enabling idea that the Constitution can be reinterpreted as fits the government's whims.
Shall not be infringed is the wording of the Constitution. The only "bullshit" is the idiotic, reprehensible notion that there can be "reasonable infringements" of that which shall not be infringed.
Post a Comment