'Progressive' CSGV objects to self-defense assistance for the poor

Ah, yes--the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence--champions of "progressive" values, which normally include helping the poor. Not in this case, obviously. Nor do Everitt and CSGV seem to have much sympathy for the plight of women unable to defend themselves, despite their habit of donning the mantle of "Protectors of Women," to the extent that they apparently believe that merely pointing out that a critic of their positions is a white male is a devastating debate point. Everitt certainly does not respond to the women quoted in the Fox article who are enthusiastic about the program.

. . .

The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence should be asked what is so "progressive" about condemning efforts to equip the poor with the means of self-defense. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.