That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend--and Facebook "likes" and "shares" are hugely appreciated.But it's not that easy, J.A. You can't just dismiss the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms because you're tired of hearing about it, any more than someone who demands you justify the societal benefits of your blog, or he'll ban it, can dismiss your First Amendment rights, because he "so got that there's a right to" free speech, and doesn't want to hear about it.
J.A. repeatedly asks, "What am I missing?" Well, rather a lot of things, J.A., chief among them being that no one owes you
any justification of our right to own militia-appropriate "regime change rifles." [More]
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Blogger demands justification for NOT banning so-called 'assault weapons'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Another example of why there is no basis for communication, and therefore no possibility of rational debate, with leftists. They demand evidence of "public benefit" to justify freedom of choice. In a free society, the burden of proof is on the government to justify restrictions.
Post a Comment