Mission statement:

Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.

I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Obama's condemnation of 'cheap handguns' reeks of self-defense 'poll tax'


With the Supreme Court, after all, having ruled that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right of the people, and if the nominal cost of photo ID is an illegal imposition on the right to vote, how can banning "cheap handguns" be anything but an imposition on the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms?

Still, racial issues aside, a president with a well known, long established proclivity for "gun control," who now seems willing to impose such control by making firearms too expensive to own, could be said to have an
incentive to govern in such a way as to foster a moribund economy that renders vast numbers of Americans of all races too poor to defend themselves. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

2 comments:

mikeb302000 said...

You always forget the part where the Supreme Court said reasonable restrictions are acceptable. In other words you "shall not be infringed" idea is bullshit.

Kurt '45superman' Hofmann said...

Is that what I "always forget," Bonomo? Wrong. I never forget Scalia's limp surrender to the "progressive," tryanny-enabling idea that the Constitution can be reinterpreted as fits the government's whims.

Shall not be infringed is the wording of the Constitution. The only "bullshit" is the idiotic, reprehensible notion that there can be "reasonable infringements" of that which shall not be infringed.