Mission statement:

Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.

I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Brady Campaign proves 'assault weapons' not defined by 'military features'

That a major anti-gun group is so transparently and unabashedly contradicting its own position is a point that cannot be made too loudly. That they are now arguing that the most expansive and restrictive "assault weapons" ban in the United States contains "dangerous loopholes" that must be closed with even more draconian gun laws is exactly the slippery slope argument in a nutshell.

Semi-automatic, detachable magazine-fed rifles are probably the best general purpose weapon for defending one's life and liberty. That's why the other side cannot abide our having them. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.


Anonymous said...

When a gun law fails to reduce crime, the Brady bunch complain of "loopholes," and whine that the bill did not go far enough. That is, their ideas fail, then they use the failure to justify more of the same failed policies. The classic definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result.