Bloomberg paying millions for power to 'infringe on your freedom'

And now think about Bloomberg's specific wording. He did not say "limit your freedom," or "impose on your freedom." He argues that the government should "infringe on [our] freedom." The word "infringe" appears (in its past tense form) precisely once in the Constitution. "Infringed," according to the supreme law of the land, is exactly what the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be.

Does anyone believe that Bloomberg's choice of that particular word was accidental? That on the day before his $12 million ad campaign in favor of federal infringements on the right to keep and bear arms began, it was not intentional on his part to spit in the faces of those of us who believe that "shall not be infringed" means exactly what it says? [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.