Illinois' Governor Quinn wants Supreme Court to back mandated defenselessness

Attorney General Madigan may or may not comply with Quinn's "suggestion," despite being no less fervently anti-gun than he is. She seems to be betting on Chicago-area legislators succeeding in forcing through a concealed carry law that only a gun-hater could love. She also notes that in taking the case to the Supreme Court, the state runs the risk of being handed another loss (if the court even agrees to take up the appeal)--this one setting a nationwide precedent that not only does the Second Amendment's right to "keep arms" mean what it says, but so does the amendment's "bear arms."

What's an anti-gun cud-muncher to do? [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.