That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.In other words, Colona wants to know if protecting Missourians' Constitutional rights is "worth" losing federal money--if perhaps Missouri should let the federal government buy the state's complicity in, or at least non-interference with, the violation of citizens' fundamental human rights. On top of that, take note of what he chooses for his example of what that federal bribe money could buy: efforts to "keep guns off the street," which sounds a whole lot like disarming Missourians. [More]
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Friday, March 01, 2013
Missouri House Democrat implies desire to sell citizens' gun rights to feds
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Federal aid is a hard drug, and state and local governments are addicts.
That says it about as well as I've seen it said, Anon.
In fact, I might be stealing that line.
Post a Comment