'One gun a month': rationing Constitutional rights

The above, though, misses the point I am trying to make. Even if limiting purchasers to one handgun per month were effective at reducing crime, that's not how Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human rights work. Lives could presumably be saved by trampling the Fourth Amendment, because more violent would-be murderers could be put away before they wrought their carnage, if the authorities could perform more searches and seizures without the cumbersome due process. Other killings could be prevented by ignoring Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination, etc. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Hope to see you there.
Digg me?

Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:

• Atlanta: Atlanta's gun free zones are not free of guns


• Austin: Gun control and addiction (Part 2)


• Charlotte: Pinelake Health and Rehab: More killings in 'gun free' zones


• Cleveland: Scare tactics: the mainstream media's war on guns


• DC: Federal court's injunction against National Park gun ban repeal fails giggle test


• Denver: Who is buying the guns in Mexico?


• Los Angeles: Another gun ban calls for getting our rights off the streets.


• Milwaukee: New anti-gun ”feel good” bills now in committee in WI Capital. CORRECTION


• Minneapolis: Should blogging require government registration?


• National: Do 90% of Mexican 'crime guns' come from U.S.?


• Seattle: SeaTac ‘open carry’ gathering sends signal to criminals


• Wisconsin: Wisconsin self defense laws