In summary, legislation like King's H.R. 2159 would empower the government--actually, considering our current Attorney General, one rabidly anti-gun official within the government--to cancel a person's right to keep and bear arms, if the government claims to suspect that person of being a terrorist. At the same time, the government is showing a tendency to regard a wider and wider swath of the citizenry as potential "terrorists."That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look.
I suppose saying this might render me suspect (as if I were not already), but that's a confluence of trends that I find deeply alarming. [More]
Digg me?
Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:
- Atlanta: Restaurant with anti-gun policy saved by a gun
- Austin: Swine flu and gun control
- Boston: Massachusetts SJC rules on dangerousness of gun possession
- Charlotte: Humane Society of the U.S.: Not just your Mom's animal shelter anymore
- Cleveland: Necessity for protection creating new gun owners
- DC: It's springtime for gun rights in Wisconsin's carryland
- Denver: Montana seeks to test states' rights
- Los Angeles: Gun Control and some of my favorite quotations
- Milwaukee: Milwaukee Police Chief Flynn bullies gun owners
- Minneapolis: Are gun owners facing a ‘perfect storm’?
- National: What's the harm in waiting for government to recognize rights?
Olofson machine gun transfer conviction upheld - Seattle: Public safety ‘crossroads’ in King County may reflect statewide, national problem on magnum scale
- Wisconsin: Sheboygan County district attorney backs VanHollen
0 comments:
Post a Comment