In other words, Ms. Rand is upset about the possibility of the Supreme Court using the Constitution--rather than a radical agenda of forcible citizen disarmament--as its guide.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
From this, I draw two conclusions. First, the VPC is effectively acknowledging that Chicago's handgun ban is unconstitutional. Second, the VPC believes its agenda should trump the Constitution. [More]
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Violence Policy Center worries that Supreme Court will heed the Constitution
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Good article, Kurt, and a nice evisceration of the VPC.
Post a Comment