It is unconscionable that to challenge laws that undermine the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms, one must either risk prosecution under those laws, or navigate an impossible Catch-22. Unconscionable, but much appreciated by those who believe that the ultimate authority rests with the government, rather than the people ostensibly served by that government. By virtue of being citizens whose rights are violated by such laws, we are more than sufficiently "injured" by them to have "standing." [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Hope you find it worth a read (and a digg?) and telling a friend.
Stumble it!
0 comments:
Post a Comment