The point is that someone sick enough to commit mass evil will either acquire what he needs despite laws banning that acquisition, or make do with what he can get--no "assault weapons" bans, background checks, magazine capacity limits, closure of mythical "gun show loopholes," etc., are going to stop him. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look (and a digg?) and tell a friend.
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Thursday, June 03, 2010
Will British gun laws get any more restrictive? Is that even possible?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment