The bottom line is that you don't even have to care about gun rights to be horrified by the idea of giving an unelected official unilateral power to deny Constitutionally guaranteed rights without a conviction, without an indictment, without being charged, without even being publicly accused of a crime. Ours is a justice system based on the presumption of innocence pending proof of guilt, or at least it's supposed to be, and what Emanuel advocates--to the cheers of the Brady Campaign--is anathema to that philosophy. [More]Today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner column is up. Please give it a look, and encourage others to do the same.
Oh yeah--do ya' Digg me, baby?
- National Gun Rights Examiner: The trail of tears
- Los Angeles Gun Rights Examiner: Saturday special: Answering the Brady Campaign Against Handgun violence.
- Cleveland Gun Rights Examiner: Can you effectively defend your beliefs?
- Charlotte Gun Rights Examiner: Phony gun groups: Fool me twice?
- Austin Gun Rights Examiner: Firearms: A great equalizer
- DC Gun Rights Examiner: DC taxpayers will pay for City Council's gun ban redux
- Milwaukee Gun Rights Examiner: Time to change our attitude about guns
- Denver Gun Rights Examiner: Who could know?
- Minneapolis Gun Rights Examiner: When is it good to fail?
0 comments:
Post a Comment