Call me the suspicious sort, but I see all kinds of potential for a sufficiently zealous administration to consider it "extremism" to point out that the Second Amendment exists as 10% of the Bill of Rights specifically to protect the people's means to kill would-be tyrants and their agents--a position I have long and loudly advocated, and intend to continue to do so as long as I have the breath to form the words. [More]Today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner is up. Please give it a look and spread the word.
Oh yeah--do ya' Digg me, baby?
- National Gun Rights Examiner: The 'evolution' of Kirsten Gillibrand
- Los Angeles Gun Rights Examiner: Virginia Tech again: when will they learn?
- Cleveland Gun Rights Examiner: What if crimes by pen were treated like crimes by gun?
- Austin Gun Rights Examiner: Children safest population group around guns (Part 2)
- DC Gun Rights Examiner: DC taxpayers will pay for City Council's gun ban redux
- Milwaukee Gun Rights Examiner: Time to change our attitude about guns
- Denver Gun Rights Examiner: Blind justice
- Minneapolis Gun Rights Examiner: The folly across the river
Stumble it!
2 comments:
I'm sure you've seen this by now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJBZZKlvrP4
Yeah--my previous column was directly about that, and I used it to lead into today's column.
Actually, the video you provided was a little better than the one I had (which had a bunch of text popping up that I didn't particularly care for). I switched 'em out--thanks.
Post a Comment