I would say that Mr. Woodward's assessment is spot-on, and the parallel between referring to a firearm as a "sniper rifle," when owned by a private citizen, and a "precision rifle," when in the hands of a police tactical unit member, should be obvious.Today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner column is something of a follow-up to Monday's. Hope ya' like.
"Sniper rifles, " of course, have not yet received nearly the volume of demonizing press that has been inflicted on so-called "assault weapons," but as I've mentioned before, groups like the Violence Policy Center (VPC) have been laying the ground work (pdf file). [More]
Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:
- Atlanta: Carrying a firearm openly is not illegal in Georgia
- Austin: 'Assault rifles' found in Austin dumpster, or media bias?
- Boston: M.D.’s fixing what ails the country
- Charlotte: Armed self-defense: Beyond the basics
- Cleveland: Liberals out of touch with reality regarding gun control
- DC: Congress joins states in making parks safe for gun carry
- Denver: When do you actually own a new gun?
- Los Angeles: Sovereignty 101, Part II: No Alternatives to the State?
- Minneapolis: A great couple of days in the Midwest
- National: Is Sotomayor Obama's 'declaration of war' on gun owners?
- Seattle: Why Sonia Sotomayor is simply wrong for the Supreme Court
- Wisconsin: Gun rights advocates make progress
Stumble it!
1 comments:
I've been doing the best effort to understand this topic picked above. Most of the people are doing the same, and we can't ignore your way to redact the information, all is about that; tactical skills to build a text. 23jj
Post a Comment