In other words, it appears that the VPC would like to remove a politician's (or political candidate's) legislative history, publicly stated positions, and political allies as topics of legitimate political discussion, because the "paranoid language" of that kind of "anti-government rhetoric" might "cause" a mentally unabalanced person to act . . . like a mentally unbalanced person. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Visits (diggs?) and help spreading the word are all much appreciated.
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Does the VPC wish to stifle political dissent?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment