The Brady Campaign called that a "victory," but so did I--chiefly because of the unconstitutionality of the voting rights language, but also because (as D.C.'s non-voting Delegate Eleanor Homes Norton warned), there's a decent chance of passing a gun rights bill without surrendering the Constitutional high ground. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner (better late than never). Please read it (digg it?) and spread the word.
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Gun rights bills, without D.C. voting rights language, introduced in Congress
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment