In other words, from the Second Amendment's right of the people to keep and bear arms as being that which shall not be infringed, Horwitz has somehow gone to insisting on no "infringement" on the government's ability to oppress--and kill--the people with no fear of effective resistance.That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. A read (and a digg?) and a word to your friends will, as always, be greatly appreciated.
To Horwitz, apparently, that would be "the rule of law" in action. If so, I repeat the assertion in today's title--such a "rule of law" needs to be threatened, and indeed openly defied and defeated. [More]
Stumble it!
3 comments:
Indeed, if the "rule of law" is threatened by a Second Amendment rally, it SHOULD be threatened, for such law is not the kind of law fit for a free republic.
I hope you don't mind if some day in the future I create a post titled "If prayer is a threat to the Government Education then Government Education needs to be threatened"
God Bless your stand to protect the rights given to us by God.
Wayne, not only would I not mind, but if my title is the inspiration, I'll take some pride in it (deservedly or not).
Thanks.
Post a Comment