Here's the thing, though: none of that matters. The Supreme Court's Heller decision, while hardly a cause for unreserved celebration among those of us who believe that shall not be infringed means what it says, does at least make clear that "sporting purposes" have nothing to do with the right guaranteed by the Second Amendment . . . [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.
Mission statement:
Armed and Safe is a gun rights advocacy blog, with the mission of debunking the "logic" of the enemies of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms.
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45superman .
I can be reached at 45superman@gmail.com.You can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/45super
Monday, January 31, 2011
'Sporting purposes' requirement must go
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment