In short, restrictive gun laws have exactly zero likelihood of disarming criminal gangs, and instead serve only to impede those who scrupulously obey laws from obtaining the best means of defending themselves from the huge--and growing--threat of these gangs. Whose side are the gun prohibitionists on, anyway? [More]Today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner column is up--I hope you'll give it a look, and maybe encourage others to do so as well. Also, the Gun Rights Examiner family has grown again--twice. Please welcome Mike Stollenwerk, of the DC Gun Rights Examiner, and Candace Dainty, of the Milwaukee Gun Rights Examiner.
The_Chef has more.
- National Gun Rights Examiner: The riddle of Steele
- Los Angeles Gun Rights Examiner: Congratulations to RNC Chairman Michael Steele. Permission to speak frankly, Sir.
- Cleveland Gun Rights Examiner: What is the Tiahrt Amendment?
- Charlotte Gun Rights Examiner: 'Ammunition Accountability' is a fraud
- Austin Gun Rights Examiner: Brady Campaign to prevent democracy? (Part 2)
- DC Gun Rights Examiner: Virginia Senator Creigh Deeds sells out gun owners, fools gun banners
- Milwaukee Gun Rights Examiner: Time to change our attitude about guns
Stumble it!
2 comments:
Hey kurt, I linked this up on The Cookbook.
Thought you'd like to see it.
http://economistscookbook.blogspot.com/2009/02/gangs-guns-and-citizen-disarmament.html
Much appreciated, Chef, and well done.
Post a Comment