Banning 'assault weapons' to protect gun rights?

I suppose Rep. Bachus would like the criminals--who wouldn't obey a ban anyway--to out-gun everyone. Besides, police have access to more firepower than private citizens can legally purchase in gun shops and at gun shows, and finally, the people's Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms is not predicated on police maintaining the ability to outgun us.

Gun rights are non-negotiable, and even if they were negotiable, Rep. Bachus is clearly not the one whom those who care about gun rights should want to have at the bargaining table. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look.

Digg me?

Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:

• Atlanta: Mainstream media misleads on the gun permit issue


• Austin: Brady Campaign: Biased, inaccurate research


• Boston: Boston TEA Party 2009 April 15, 2009


• Charlotte: 'Red neck driving range'


• Cleveland: What's the matter with you people, can't you see the sky is falling?


• DC: 6 Va. Democrats flip flop & vote to limit military members to 1 handgun a year


• Denver: Why we can't close the "gun show loophole"


• Los Angeles: If I Only Had A Gun misfires for 20/20 when they cannot stay on topic.


• Milwaukee: Vote today for Constitutional justice- Vote Koschnick


• Minneapolis: A Cowboy's Easter


• National: If we can't trust ATF under oath, when can we trust them?


• Seattle: WA senator's 'open season on criminals' remark misrepresented, but not 'lead enema'


• Wisconsin: New judge in town