Characterizing the right to keep and bear arms as a fundamental right, no mention of "sporting purposes," explicit mention of the value of an armed citizenry for defense against invasion and terrorism, and best of all, of the need for the people's ability to have the means to resist a tyrannical government--precisely the kinds of things the Brady Campaign, Violence Policy Center, and especially the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (CSGV), with their advocacy of a government monopoly on force, don't want to hear. [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look.
Digg me?
Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:
- Atlanta: Right to bear arms apparently does not include government property
- Austin: Columbine: Still struggling to accept the lessons (page 3)
- Boston: Oath taker or oath keeper?
- Charlotte: Guns and the barometer of discontent
- Cleveland: Ten years after Columbine, we still haven't learned real lessons
- DC: NATO fiddles while pirates burn our ships
- Denver: Understanding the lessons from the Columbine High School shooting
- Los Angeles: The lesson of Columbine examined
- Milwaukee: Vote today for Constitutional justice- Vote Koschnick
- Minneapolis: A Cowboy's Easter
- National: Ninth Circuit incorporates Second Amendment!
- Seattle: The real lesson of Columbine
- Wisconsin: JB Van Hollen open carry opinion
Stumble it!
3 comments:
Please come back to reality. Anyone who thinks this is a real concern is living in a fantasy world.
"and best of all, of the need for the people's ability to have the means to resist a tyrannical government"
Mikeb has had another psycotic break. Must be off his meds.
I'm starting to wonder if the "b" in "mikeb302000" stands for "beard"--he and Mike Beard sound almost exactly alike in their extremist advocacy of forcible citizen disarmament and tyranny enabling.
Post a Comment