For anyone who believes the federal government can legitimately exercise only the powers explicitly enumerated by the Constitution as being within its purview (in other words, anyone who actually reads the Constitution, and is honest about what it says), there is no debate--the federal government has zero power to regulate arms produced in Montana, and that are kept within the state (rather than sold in interstate commerce, and thus made subject to federal regulation under the commerce clause). [More]That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner.
Digg me?
Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:
- Atlanta: Georgia Tech's school safety zone renders its students and employees vulnerable
- Austin: Texas State Senator Glenn Hegar discusses state sovereignty
- Boston: Massachusetts Gun Law – time for real reform (Part IV)
- Charlotte: Mexicali lies on 'assault weapons:' The real agenda?
- Cleveland: Gun rights activists are not to blame for Pittsburgh slayings
- DC: San Diego District Attorney says LA DA's memo on open carry is wrong!
- Denver: Binghamton NY and other sheep pens
- Los Angeles: Anti-gun Wingnuts, what's by Your bed?
- Milwaukee: New anti-gun ”feel good” bills now in committee in WI Capital. CORRECTION
- Minneapolis: Breaking News: Was Pittsburgh gunman ineligible to possess firearms?
- National: Who is spreading fear, hatred and lies in Pittsburgh shooter story?
- Seattle: Someone forgot to tell killers that murder is against the law
- Wisconsin: Use and threat of lethal force
0 comments:
Post a Comment