No excuse for Black Friday NICS failures

Realistically, of course, the political will to dismantle the background check system will not exist any time in the foreseeable future. That takes us back to the other option--"fixing" NICS to make it robust enough to handle any conceivable volume of sales. That will no doubt require money--not a pleasing prospect in these times of soaring national debt and out of control government spending.

Still, what price can be put on freedom? No cost is too high to protect Americans from any further hardship in arming themselves to protect their homes, lives, families and liberty. A free people cannot afford not to keep access to the tools of life and liberty preservation (and genocide prevention) as easy as possible. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Obama administration rumored to be considering semiautomatic ban by decree

Still, though, Obama's hostility to an armed American citizenry is well documented, as is his willingness to bypass Congress when that darned Constitution and its inconvenient separation of powers get in the way.

What he needs to realize is that this move, if he makes it, would start a war. It is not a war he would win. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Writer says gun rights are safe, and gun rights advocates are bigoted white men

Milligan was of course not done yet. No condemnation of "gun nuts" could possibly be complete without describing them as white men ("Ward Cleaver"-types, in Milligan's piece), prejudiced against non-whites, women, homosexuals, etc. (What? Nothing about the inadequacy of gun rights advocates' reproductive anatomy? The space allotted for Milligan's piece must have been running low).

There may be "nuts" and bigots in the gun rights/"gun control" debate--but Milligan and her ideological allies who wish to find them would be best advised to look for them in a mirror. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Bomb-making, 'assault weapon' hording 'insurrectionist'--and 'Occupier'--jailed

According to CSGV, advising readers to download and file any information they can find on the construction of improvised explosive weapons, in case such information is needed someday to thwart a government bent on tyranny, is "treason," (a capital crime, meaning, basically, that CSGV is calling for the author's execution). Actually acquiring bomb-making materials, to oppose "the capitalist free market paradigm," and to "fight against gross inequality in distribution of income and assets," as part of "the second American independence revolution," does not even merit discussion.

The "Coalition to Stop Gun Violence" seems rather unconcerned about any potential violence to be committed by the Army of "Occupation." And we are the "traitors"? [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Gun-hater calls for forcible disarmament based on ideology

This correspondent would certainly not meet Kamm's ideological requirements for gun ownership--a point of considerable pride. The question is, what does Kamm intend to do about it? Whose sons and daughters is he willing to send into harm's way in order to enforce his dream of ideology-based disarmament? [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Illinois gun owners wishing to secede from U.S. may have it backward

The Illinois state constitution does include its own protection for the right to keep and bear arms, but (at the urging of Cook County politicians) Section 22 of the state constitution was amended in 1970 to qualify the right to keep and bear arms with "Subject only to the police power." In other words, gun rights in Illinois "shall not be infringed"--except to the extent that the state chooses to infringe on them.

It seems as if Illinois gun owners might be better off petitioning to join the United States, since they seem at the moment to be denied one of the rights guaranteed--at least in theory--to residents of the other 49 states. On November 6, in fact, the voters in 10 Illinois counties (100% of the counties that had put the measure up for a vote) approved non-binding resolutions in support of concealed carry. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Psychiatrist displays his anti-gun insanity

A reduction in violence is not necessary to justify more draconian gun laws--if the laws help express his distaste for guns, that is all the justification he needs.

Doctor, heal thyself--or better yet, find a better, saner healer for that job. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Anti-gun immigrant chides Americans for 'literal following of the Constitution'

We "need to get off [our] literal following of the Constitution"? We are, in other words, to believe that the supreme law of the land is to be taken figuratively? What point could there be to a Constitution in which every guarantee of the people's rights can be dismissed as not really meaning what it says? What would be to stop the government from claiming, for example, that the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech is a figure of, well . . . speech?

As Americans, we will not be limited to only the rights that meet the approval of someone who believes that the Constitution is no more than a suggestion to the government about the limits on its power. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Colorado, Washington pot reforms make 'progressive' case for Firearm Freedom Act

The next step should be to protect commerce in both guns and marijuana with legislation patterned off Wyoming's Firearms Freedom Act, which imposes criminal penalties on agents of the federal government who enforce federal gun laws in defiance of Wyoming law (a proposed, but not passed, New Hampshire law would have gone even further, and made the penalty a felony).

Given the power of the federal government, the state police and county sheriffs would likely need some assistance in enforcing these laws against violation by federal agencies like the DEA and BATFE. A strong, well equipped militia would be just the ticket, although the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence would inevitably shriek "insurrection!" [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Post-election guns and ammo panic buying spree has begun: There is a better way

If you do not yet have the weapons, ammunition and ancillary gear you need to defend your family, your freedom and your life, it would certainly make sense to acquire them as soon as possible--while it is possible. For the future, though, think about how preferable it would be to defeat the evil of forcible citizen disarmament, rather than scrambling in preparation for enduring it. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

No election will bring about 'government monopoly on force'

No one wants liberty to hang on "voting from the rooftops" (or perhaps, given the recent dust-up with the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, "voting from the explosives workshop"), but that will happen before we allow ourselves to be disarmed. Depend on it. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

CSGV equates knowledge with 'insurrection,' wants it suppressed

Acquiring theoretical knowledge about how to build such weapons is preparation--and rather early stage preparation, at that. The government's preparations for war with the people could be said to be rather further along, and remember that this administration claims the "clear authority" to kill U.S. citizens without trial. If preparation for war is the same as waging it, as CSGV seems to contend, then the war has already started, with the government as the aggressor.

As Mike Vanderboegh (the real target of Horwitz's latest) has often said (worded various ways), "If the rule of law no longer protects us from government tyranny, it no longer protects that tyranny and its acolytes from us." The government would be very well advised to remember that, and also that the resistance will be equipped with more than firearms. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Coalition to Stop Gun Violence lowers bar on what constitutes 'liberty'

In a very real sense, CSGV is claiming that there can be no tyranny, no serfdom, no oppression, as long as the government generously restrains itself from actually killing the people (although CSGV advocates a government "right" to do that, too).

Imagine if, for the birth of our nation, we were not blessed with the greatness of Patrick Henry, but instead cursed with the abject, boot-licking cowardice of CSGV. "Give me liberty or give me death" would have been replaced with "Give me liberty, or . . . not, but at least let me keep my pathetic, cowardly life!" If, instead of Benjamin Franklin, we had CSGV: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve a big pat on the back for being so clever." There would, in short, have been no birth of the United States of America as a free nation. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Oath Keepers alter 'the guys with the guns make the rules' calculus in our favor

The Oath Keepers are one more obstacle in the path of CSGV's "government monopoly on force," and still more unforgivably, act as that obstacle despite being what groups like CSGV hope would be a primary instrument of that monopoly. Bad news for the government's war at home--and its CSGV cheerleaders. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

'The guys with the guns make the rules'; anti-gun groups know it, prefer it

Still more recently than that, we observed that merely advocating acquiring the knowledge to construct "Constitutional pyrotechnics," as a militia ordnance engineer, is enough for CSGV to advocate sending the FBI (armed, of course) to imprison the offending author, with the understanding that if he resists robustly enough, he will be killed.

The guys with the guns do indeed make the rules, and the "gun control" groups would not change that even if they could. What they would change is the fact that it is We the People who have hundreds of millions of the guns. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Multiple long gun purchase reporting requirement was 'first step'

If one argues that merely reporting multiple handgun sales is not enough to interdict trafficking, and that what is needed is a multiple handgun sale ban, how can one argue that a multiple rifle sale reporting requirement will be enough to stop the trafficking?

The gun ban groups, and their ideological allies in both the mass media and the government, will not try to make that argument. They are simply waiting for the right time to say that the reporting requirement was a "good first step," but more is needed. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Take over the 'conversation': Show Brady Campaign real grassroots in action

In Illinois, carrying effective means of self-defense makes one a "criminal" #wearebetterthanthis

Along the southwest border, buying 2 rifles in a week makes one a suspect for international arms trafficking #wearebetterthanthis

Obama admin complicit in killing US law officers & 100s of Mexicans in #fastandfurious to justify more "gun control" #wearebetterthanthis

DoJ says requiring ID for voting is "racist," but requires that PLUS INTRUSIVE BACKGROUND CHECK for exercise of #RKBA #wearebetterthanthis

Even in most states that "allow" armed self-defense, one must ask (and pay) for "permission" to do so legally #wearebetterthanthis

Readers can undoubtedly come up with many more of their own, but feel free to copy the above examples as well.

We are better than a society that allows a "government monopoly on force"--or at least we had better be. If not, we will have only ourselves to blame for the outcome. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

More on Bannerman's ('Laci the Dog's') 'plan' to get me arrested (or at least fired)

Today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner column talked about the laughable campaign that the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence started yesterday to pressure Examiner.com into dropping me as a writer, and maybe even (get this) get me arrested for "Advocating Overthrow of Government".

The "strategist" behind this, especially the get-me-arrested part, is Michael Bannerman (aka "Laci the Dog"), whom we most recently discussed here. Laci the Bannerman . . . oops, I mean Michael the Dog . . . hell--something like that--is an apparently severely mentally handicapped attorney.

Interestingly (well, "hilariously" is more accurate), Bannerman, who enthusiastically parrots CSGV's charges against me of "treason," and of being a "traitor," has himself publicly expressed his great admiration for Benedict Arnold.

Unfortunately, by the time I wrote today's column, Bannerman had, for whatever reason (and that is an interesting question), made his plans for my demise, as outlined on CSGV's Facebook page, unavailable for viewing, by the rather extreme method of closing his Facebook account altogether. But then again . . .

. . . The internet never forgets, and Google Cache comes to the rescue. Don't know how long that will be up, so I of course took screen captures (click to enlarge):

Update: Oops--apparently, Bannerman's Facebook account is still active after all--just blocked from my eyes. Going to his comments in a browser in which I am not logged into Facebook, I see them just fine. Sorry for the confusion.

Most of the details (such as they are) appear in the second one. Here are some "highlights":

report Hofmann here https://tips.fbi.gov

FBI — Tips
tips.fbi.gov
The information I've provided on this form is correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that providing false information could subject me to fine, imprisonment, or both. (Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 1001).

And . . .

BTW, this violates the examiner's ToS: 6. Prohibited Content and Activities You agree that you will not post to the Site, or use the Site to transmit or make available any Content that: violates any laws or regulations, contains any threats, is abusive, tortious, harassing, vulgar, obscene, indecent, violates any person's rights of privacy or publicity, is defamatory, libelous, hateful, contains any disparaging statements or opinions regarding racial, gender or ethnic background, or is otherwise objectionable;

And . . .

I think if enough complaints are made to the examiner at: legal@examiner.com--don't forget to cite 18 USC CHAPTER 115, Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 2385, which violates the ToS. And the FBI, they'll begin to get the message.

Oh--CSGV was quite interested in pursuing this:

Michael, please email us your reading of that case law at csgv@csgv.org

Perhaps the most interesting of Bannerman's comments, though, was the last one:

Michael Bannerman I am posting this at the Brady Discussion group. Additionally, I would also suggest that other also fille [sic] a complaint to the FBI using the above link. Dennis v. US says this is treason, and anyone who lived through the 60s knows that the left was persecuted by this statute.

What I find interesting about this is not that Bannerman is whining about the supposed "double standard" of prosecuting a commie in the Dennis v. U.S. case--that's too predictable to be interesting. No, the interesting part is that he complains that "the left was 'persecuted' [not 'prosecuted']." In other words, he seems to be basically admitting that what he wants for me is not prosecution for some notional crime that I obviously never committed, but persecution, for daring to say things that offended his delicate sensibilities.

That would piss me off, if it weren't so hysterically hilarious that he apparently thought (and perhaps still does) that this has some chance of actually working. No hard feelings here--I'll just continue to laugh at his dumb ass.

By the way, am supremely grateful for the support of several of my favorite bloggers:
Why Does CSGV Feel So Threatened By A Blogger In A Wheelchair?
Friday CSGV Nuttery Dump.
The Hofmann Menace
John Richardson asks: Why Does CSGV Feel So Threatened By A Blogger In A Wheelchair?
Ladd Everitt/CSGV Get Their Censorship On

When thwarted in efforts to trample 2nd Amendment, CSGV goes after the 1st

The Second Amendment to the Constitution is the firewall which secures all the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, but to some extent, the First Amendment protects the others, including the Second, as well. If the gun ban lobby can win a "monopoly on authority to define the Second Amendment," they can render that portion of the Bill of Rights irrelevant, thus coming closer to realizing their dream of a "government monopoly on force."

CSGV's push for forcible citizen disarmament is merely the means to an end, that end being a docile, obedient, subservient (and "progressive") society that does not dare--and cannot even imagine--questioning, let alone resisting, the government, no matter its excesses. It should therefore come as no surprise that they see the First Amendment as much an obstacle to overcome as is the Second. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

CSGV demonizes militias, endorses government extortion

CSGV's Twitter feed repeatedly excoriates the county's residents for not agreeing to a tax increase, thus "refus[ing] to give law enforcement the resources they need" (more on that theme here and here). Kinda sounds like a protection racket, doesn't it? "You got a real nice county here. Hate to see anything happen to it." Just give the government more money, and you won't need the means to defend yourself, your family and your community. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Wisconsin spa victims were not killed by 'loophole' in private gun sale laws

Two things could have prevented this atrocity: the killer's imprisonment before it ever happened, or the ability of his intended victims to effectively resist. The police chose not to make the first happen, and would have enforced the prohibition against the second.

And somehow, this is the NRA's fault. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

'Gun control' not top priority even for gun ban lobby's newest hero

In other words, according to "another great column" (so says CSGV), this "undecided voter" (despite apparently also being a registered Democrat) would vote not for the candidate who has vowed to seek to renew the "assault weapons ban," but for the one who has vowed (credibly or not) to oppose it, if the latter can convince her that he would be better for the economy.

An army of gun rights advocates would be willing to die to prevent the forcible disarmament of America--and a willingness to die for a cause implies a willingness to kill for it, as well. How many "gun control" advocates are willing to die for an "assault weapons" ban? Whatever the number, we have enough ammo for all of them. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

CSGV director worries more about political ideology than about machine guns

In other words, the government is to be empowered to demand respect, and failure to comply "borders on" the capital crime of treason.

With every word, CSGV more clearly reveals that the group wants our guns taken, but only as a means to an end. The desired end is a docile, obedient nation of herbivores that relies on the government so completely that the mere thought of resistance against that government, for any reason, is impossible.

A citizenry that allows that end to be realized can only blame itself for whatever happens to it. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

St. Louis mayor hopes to combat 'gun crime' with baseball

Still, a mayor who disparages the idea of citizens protecting themselves from violent crime, but instead asks them to rely on the Cardinals to provide their security is a mayor who could be said to have a rather tenuous grasp on reality. At least one former Cardinal would probably agree.

Could be worse, though--at least he is apparently not counting on a Rams playoff run to save the city. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Obama's condemnation of 'cheap handguns' reeks of self-defense 'poll tax'

With the Supreme Court, after all, having ruled that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right of the people, and if the nominal cost of photo ID is an illegal imposition on the right to vote, how can banning "cheap handguns" be anything but an imposition on the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms?

Still, racial issues aside, a president with a well known, long established proclivity for "gun control," who now seems willing to impose such control by making firearms too expensive to own, could be said to have an incentive to govern in such a way as to foster a moribund economy that renders vast numbers of Americans of all races too poor to defend themselves. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

In debate, Obama abandons 'under the radar' path to forcible citizen disamament

Obama once supposedly assured Sarah Brady that he was working "under the radar" on forcible citizen disarmament. He has apparently now decided that the time for stealth has ended.

The gloves are coming off--ours must as well. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Former Supreme Court Justice cites flawed interpretation of flawed decision

The forcible citizen disarmament lobby's reliance on the (badly, and probably deliberately, misinterpreted) Miller decision is notable for another reason. Has so much weight ever been accorded to any other Supreme Court decision in which there was no oral argument given--nor even a written brief filed--for the defense?

That, one could argue, is just what one might expect from the Second Amendment deniers. Like a government bent on tyranny (or a thug bent on rape, or a lunatic bent on mass murder), they greatly prefer that their objective be undefended, and their agenda unopposed. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Ryan punts on 'Project Gunwalker' as debate issue, but it could have been worse

Eventually, of course, the Brady staffer's tenuous connection to reality solidified enough to force the realization that this Facebook post made the group a laughingstock, so the post was taken down and replaced (how much more embarrassing can a post be, than for one's only hope to salvage a tiny shred of dignity is to replace it with a whining plea for attention?).

Yes, last night was a disappointment, but at least no one came out of it looking like the Brady Campaign. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

VPC finds high rate of 'gun deaths' in jurisdictions with very strict gun laws

In other words, if, as VPC seems to claim, shooting deaths in the "DMV" (District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia) are remarkably high relative to the rest of the country, the logical conclusion would seem to be that restrictive gun laws are not an effective deterrent to "gun violence." That comes as no surprise to those of us who have honestly followed the gun rights vs. "gun control" debate for any length of time (some, in fact, convincingly argue exactly the opposite), but not a conclusion one would expect the VPC to lead us to. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

CSGV backs government 'right' to political violence against citizens

Never mind that CSGV had never before placed that particular qualifier on their "monopoly" advocacy. The point is to remember that the discussion here was about the "government monopoly on force," so if that monopoly is about the use of "political violence," then what they're advocating is not only rendering the people's effective resistance to a tyrannical government impossible, but also that governments do have a right to use violence against citizens for political purposes. President Obama is presumably grateful. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Illinois Democrats seek new punitive taxes on ammunition

Meanwhile, there are also proposals for new ammunition taxes at the state level. Illinois HB 1274 and HB 5167 do not look likely to go anywhere, but they do serve well as further demonstrations (if such demonstrations were necessary) of Illinois Democrats' desire to punish peaceable gun owners for the crimes of violent thugs.

If we are to have a "violence tax," then we should impose it directly on the criminals committing the violence, and make it payable in blood. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Government will push back against home manufactured guns

In other words, one should not expect even widespread availability of the means to easily make effective firearms at home to win the war on "gun control" by itself. In the end, it will still require decent people willing to fight and die--or, preferably, kill--for their liberty. The government's problem is our hands--they're not cold and dead yet. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

CSGV becoming increasingly frantic over 'printable gun'

Andrew Goddard is the father of professional victim Colin "The Alchemist" Goddard, and generally tries to portray himself as passionately opposed to "gun violence"--and here he is wishing the decapitation by firearm of an American citizen. Interestingly, CSGV has tacitly endorsed Goddard's bloody wish by not criticizing the comment or deleting it (CSGV routinely deletes comments it doesn't like, including over half of them on this post--so much for "reasoned discourse"--but Goddard's is still there. In fact, four people gave that comment the "thumbs up" of approval.

CSGV and their fellow travelers are so committed to their sick agenda of a "government monopoly on force" that they wish death on those who would make that monopoly impossible. Such people are exactly the reason the "Wiki Weapon" project is so vital to not only Americans, but to the world. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Michael Bannerman (AKA 'Laci the Dog') doesn't want arresting people to require any broken laws

Earlier this week, I wrote about the "Wiki Gun" project, headed by a young man named Cody Wilson, to develop a design for a handgun to be made in its entirety by a 3-D printer, and to then make that design available, free of charge, to anyone with internet access. It's an ambitious project, and not all of the difficulties are mechanical in nature (the makers of the high-end 3-D printer revoked the lease without warning when they became aware of the nature of the project).

Yesterday, the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence noted this development on their Facebook page. This is not the first time CSGV has been disturbed by this impending death of "gun control"--an earlier article of mine prompted this anguished bleating on CSGV's Facebook page (check out the comments, too--they're hilarious):

The latest in gun nuttery: Insurrectionists threatening to make AK-47s out of printers if new gun laws enacted.

They also mentioned it on Twitter.

The latest comment replying to yesterday's CSGV Facebook post is especially interesting:

Michael Bannerman: He should be arrested for doing this.

If the name "Michael Bannerman" sounds familiar, there is a good reason for that. Bannerman is the real name of the rabidly, virulently, anti-guns, anti-rights, subhuman sack of vileness who more often writes under the name of his hideous, mangy, rodent-like "dog," to whom he refers as "Laci the Dog."

I've talked about this little parasite a couple times before. Nowadays, he doesn't seem to be currently active on any blogs of his own, but often spews his intellectually and morally bankrupt verbal pollution at "Mikeb302000"--just the place for such sewage.

Now he is advocating the arrest of a man against whom there is exactly ZERO evidence of any crimes (oh, and did I mention that Bannerman is a lawyer?). Pretty much par for the course, I suppose.

If people like that ever acquire any power, we're going to have to get our hands very bloody. I'm ready.

Update: CSGV is now worried enough about Cody Wilson (the "Wiki Weapon" visionary) to have hung the dreaded "insurrectionist" label on him (and again, check out the comments--they're precious). In fact, he has even made their silly "Insurrectionism Timeline":

I like this guy better and better all the time.

St. Louis police chief wants federal gun laws to control local crime

Obviously, no matter what the answers to these questions are (and holding one's breath waiting for those answers from Isom is probably a bad idea), we will still not even have touched an explanation of how to reconcile such laws with shall not be infringed, or why every peaceable gun owner in the U.S. should suffer more oppressive gun regulation because of the crimes of St. Louis thugs.

Isom has been an enemy of gun rights his entire tenure in St. Louis, and apparently plans to end that tenure with no change to that status. And now, he will be teaching that anti-rights attitude to criminology students. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

VA Tech professor touts radical new advance in weapons technology

She must know something about some imminent advance in weaponry, because obviously she cannot be contending that weapons themselves are obsolete. As long as the strong continue to prey on the weak, the large on the small, the numerous on the few, weapons, with their ability to make predation even by the strong risky, will be necessary.

On a larger scale, as long as people are organized under governments, people must have the power to destroy those governments and their hired muscle, when those governments seek to abuse their power. In other words, weapons are unlikely ever to become obsolete. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

An arms factory in every home: Gun control fights against its inevitable demise

That, though, is largely beside the point. The Wiki Gun project is more a proof of concept than an attempt to produce practical firearms right now. This is something we have discussed before, and will be the death of "gun control." The "government monopoly on force" so beloved of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence is becoming idle fantasy.

Not a moment too soon. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Administration's 'Gunwalking' facilitated bloodiest massacres in Mexico

The massacres of young people could be said to have in a way been the point of "Project Gunwalker"--provoking visceral outrage over the appalling waste of innocent life, in order to engender public support for stricter gun regulation. It is well past time for Americans--and Mexicans--to punish those responsible for this abomination--this human sacrifice in service of a political goal (and an evil, unconstitutional, freedom crushing, genocide enabling goal at that). "No blood for 'gun control.'" [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

The government's war at home

Taken separately, each of these developments is more than a little ominous. Taken together, the conclusion that the government is preparing for war against the people becomes difficult to escape (particularly when looked at alongside the government's apparent hostility to the Oath Keepers). In light of that, it would seem that the people would be well advised to step up our own preparations. As Mike Vanderboegh often asks, "Got militia?" [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Communists for 'gun control'

Those who dub themselves "progressive" cannot tolerate a society in which the people have the power, or even the desire, to defend themselves and their interests, rather than rely on the government to do it.

A disarmed citizenry is a helpless citizenry. That is precisely the kind of citizenry that collectivists want, and precisely the kind that "gun control" groups want. And oops--the previous sentence looks like another redundancy. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Help put out the fire

Late to the party, as usual, I should long ago have added my voice to those of numerous other gun bloggers calling for support for a new documentary--"Assaulted: Civil Rights Under Fire."

When the subject of California’s gun control laws are discussed, rarely are they associated with the civil rights movement and the quest for equal rights for all. This film will compare the historical aspects of gun control targeting the indigenous tribes of North America and emancipated slaves through the Jim Crow era to today’s laws that favor elitists and denies the rights guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment to the most vulnerable in our society. The film takes a critical look at the original intent of the current California guns laws in contrast with crime and murder statistics before and since their implementation; and compares these laws to those of the adjacent states. Story threads also look at the myriad of concealed carry permitting processes across the state to illustrate that not all residents are treated equal.

Please help out any way you can--and soon.

'An Act of Bravery': Otis McDonald biography now available

McDonald took on the most oppressive forcible citizen disarmament laws in the country, which Chicago's mayor at the time defended with millions of Chicago taxpayers' dollars--and won. This quiet man could no longer stay quiet in the face of the denial of his Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms. He could no longer meekly submit to laws that denied his right to defend his life and loved ones. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Gun ownership, and even militia membership, becoming more popular, diverse

The Brady Campaign's Dennis "What People?" Henigan has complained in the past about media coverage of the militia movement that fails to portray those involved as racist terrorists. The fact that the Herald-Tribune refuses to paint them in that light, and that the same militia will soon be featured in programs on both MTV and National Geographic, will undoubtedly make him even more unhappy.

The Brady Campaign, VPC, CSGV and the Southern Poverty Law Center would all prefer that the public share their fear and loathing of militias. The question to ask them, perhaps, is if militias are "necessary to the security of a free state," then who are the "traitors" to America--the militia members, or those who oppose them? [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Obama straight up lies to Hispanic voters about 'Project Gunwalker'

What excuse for this lie will be offered in Obama's defense? Will it be claimed that it was just a "mistake"--that he still has not learned enough about the "Gunwalker" atrocity to have even figured out when it started (since presumably, even his most desperate defenders will not try to claim he forgot when his administration began)? If so, would Hispanic voters not be justified in asking how a president could be so callously indifferent about establishing the facts about a U.S. federal government operation that resulted in hundreds of dead Mexican citizens, and will undoubtedly continue to cause more deaths (on both sides of the border--and even farther abroad) for years to come?

Could Hispanic voters further be forgiven for wondering why an administration that sent thousands of the firearms Obama most wants banned as being "too dangerous" for private citizens, to brutal killers in Mexico, won't let Latinos have forks in Obama's presence? You can bet that there will be no "Project Forkwalker" under this administration. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner once again honored by CSGV

That's objectionable?

Only to those who believe that governments should get a free pass to commit evil with impunity. Those would be the same folks who clamor for a "government monopoly on force."

There is as much nobility in being despised by the despicable, as in being admired by the admirable. The contempt and loathing of those who advocate forcible citizen disarmament is thus a great honor indeed. Thank you, CSGV. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

OIG 'Gunwalker' report does not 'exonerate' Holder, but is still whitewash

Remember also that, although the IG investigation covered only the DoJ, there were at least two other Cabinet-level departments involved in Operation Fast and Furious (Department of Homeland Security and Treasury, and it is difficult to imagine the State Department being left completely in the dark). IG Horowitz explained today that his investigation sought a voluntary interview with a DHS agent, but could not compel the agent to speak, because being outside the DoJ, the agent had the right to refuse--a right he exercised.

Somehow, then, we are expected to believe that this multiple Cabinet level department operation was going on without the head of the most central department knowing about it. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Josh Horwitz laughably accuses gun rights advocates of disregarding Constitution

According to Horwitz, in order to have "faith" in the Constitution, one must believe that a power hungry government can be thwarted in its desires to usurp the power of the people, simply because words on parchment say that it must not. That is, obviously, a ludicrous notion. The Constitution itself protects nothing, unless it is enforced.

The enforcers must be the people--us--and enforcement may require something stronger than harsh language. The Founders knew this--knew that, as Edward R. Murrow said, "A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves." A disarmed citizenry--a citizenry that allows itself to be disarmed--is indeed "a nation of sheep." That is what CSGV would have us be. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Obama administration colludes with Media Matters to bury 'Gunwalker' scandal

As has been observed previously, MM is well compensated for its rabidly pro-administration, anti-gun positions (by the same virulently anti-gun foundation on whose board Obama served for eight years), although that apparently hasn't stopped MM founder David Brock from making his own, sometimes illegal, armed security arrangements.

For "the most transparent administration ever," this one certainly likes to maintain tight control over what is said about it. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Gun 'buy backs,' and using the enemies' own resources against them

Still, though, that does not mean that resourceful gun rights advocates cannot use these "buy backs" to come out ahead. A central Illinois gun rights group, Guns Save Life (sometimes called the Champaign County Rifle Association) has perfected this strategy (for years, and years), collecting junk guns, selling them to the "buy back," and using the proceeds to fund such worthy gun rights advocacy efforts as youth shooting camps (building the next generation of gun rights advocates).

. . .

It must take a lot of the fun out of working for the suppression of the Constitutionally guaranteed, fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.

Why we need 'high capacity' magazines: Because there are more than 10 Democrats

As has been pointed out elsewhere, party platforms fall far short of telling the whole story, because they are not binding on any individual politician within the party. Still, they do give a sense of the position that the party leadership would like to take the party. Viewed in that light, it becomes obvious that the Democrats want guns regulated to a draconian degree this country has never seen.

They must be stopped. By whatever means necessary. [More]

That's today's St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Please give it a look, and tell a friend.